[ImageJ-devel] [Bug 639] New: ImageJ2 with QuickPalm plugin

[bugzilla at fiji.sc]

http://fiji.sc/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=639

            Bug ID: 639
           Summary: ImageJ2 with QuickPalm plugin
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: Fiji
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: Other
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: critical
          Priority: P5
         Component: ImageJ2
          Assignee: imagej-devel at imagej.net
          Reporter: oo370 at nyu.edu
          Deadline: 2013-07-29

Created attachment 111
  --> http://fiji.sc/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=111&action=edit
simple macros for testing ImageJ2 with QuickPALM plug-in on the cluster

The resulting images after processing them with ImageJ2 together with QuickPalm
plugin is not the same as images processed with ImageJ together with QuickPalm.
Generally, I have small macros (see attachment) which takes a multi-framed
image, splits the channels and then analyses each channel separately with the
quickPALM plugin. After analysis and reconstruction I save the resulting
images.

I have run this macros both on ImageJ-win64 version of the ImageJ2 (beta
version), and the same macros on ImageJ-linux64 (also beta version). The
resulting images after reconstruction are different while I would expect them
to be identical. 

Also ImageJ-linux64 gives me a warning in the command line: "multichannel image
is required". While ImageJ-win64.exe version of ImageJ2 does not complain and
have the same results as ImageJ1 version.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://imagej.net/pipermail/imagej-devel/attachments/20130724/dbccffcd/attachment.html>