<html>
<head>
<base href="http://fiji.sc/bugzilla/" />
</head>
<body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>Bug ID</th>
<td><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - ImageJ2 with QuickPalm plugin"
href="http://fiji.sc/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=639">639</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Summary</th>
<td>ImageJ2 with QuickPalm plugin
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Classification</th>
<td>Unclassified
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Product</th>
<td>Fiji
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Version</th>
<td>unspecified
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Hardware</th>
<td>Other
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>OS</th>
<td>Linux
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Status</th>
<td>NEW
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Severity</th>
<td>critical
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Priority</th>
<td>P5
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Component</th>
<td>ImageJ2
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Assignee</th>
<td>imagej-devel@imagej.net
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Reporter</th>
<td>oo370@nyu.edu
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Deadline</th>
<td>2013-07-29
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<pre>Created <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=111" name="attach_111" title="simple macros for testing ImageJ2 with QuickPALM plug-in on the cluster">attachment 111</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=111&action=edit" title="simple macros for testing ImageJ2 with QuickPALM plug-in on the cluster">[details]</a></span>
simple macros for testing ImageJ2 with QuickPALM plug-in on the cluster
The resulting images after processing them with ImageJ2 together with QuickPalm
plugin is not the same as images processed with ImageJ together with QuickPalm.
Generally, I have small macros (see attachment) which takes a multi-framed
image, splits the channels and then analyses each channel separately with the
quickPALM plugin. After analysis and reconstruction I save the resulting
images.
I have run this macros both on ImageJ-win64 version of the ImageJ2 (beta
version), and the same macros on ImageJ-linux64 (also beta version). The
resulting images after reconstruction are different while I would expect them
to be identical.
Also ImageJ-linux64 gives me a warning in the command line: "multichannel image
is required". While ImageJ-win64.exe version of ImageJ2 does not complain and
have the same results as ImageJ1 version.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>