[ImageJ-devel] Maven TrackMate Dependency Question

[Curtis Rueden]

Hi Jay,

Eclipse has tools to understand where deps are coming from. Double click
the pom.xml and see the Dependency Hierarchy tab. Much faster than
guesswork and experimentation.

-Curtis
On Sep 14, 2014 6:52 AM, "Jay Warrick" <jay.w.warrick at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok. So this makes more sense...  TrackMate v 2.3 uses
> the <groupId>${jama.groupId}</groupId> which causes the error, which was
> fixed by TrackMate v2.5 which uses <groupId>gov.nist.math</groupId>.
>
> So the whole issue boils down to, "Why is maven trying to do ANYTHING with
> v 2.3 when I can't find a single dependency on this version? If I can get
> Maven to stop looking for v 2.3 my issue will be solved.
>
> Thoughts on where to search for hidden/residual links to v 2.3 given what
> I've checked already?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jay
>
> On Sep 14, 2014, at 6:45 AM, Jay Warrick <jay.w.warrick at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think never mind. Still learning about Maven, but it looks like the
> groupID is assumed the same as the parent so you TrackMate doesn't need to
> define it. Should have guessed this based on how everything else seems to
> work in Maven.
>
> On Sep 14, 2014, at 6:15 AM, Jay Warrick <jay.w.warrick at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If this might be on the right track, is there any way to test this on my
> end? Use offline mode and go into my .m2 repository and muck with poms or
> something?
> On Sep 14, 2014, at 6:11 AM, Jay Warrick <jay.w.warrick at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi JY,
>
> Could it be a problem with the TrackMate groupId? Searching the internet
> with the error string brought up this past issue with jama and SPIM...
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/fiji-devel/zEhBIf1bZEA
>
> When I look at the TrackMate pom, I don't think I see a "groupId" defined
> for the TrackMate plugin. Hard for me to completely decipher in the issue
> discussion if this would cause the problem I'm seeing or if it would merely
> prevent the imageJ/Fiji folks from "seeing" that such a problem exists.
>
> Stephan Preibisch, Curtis, and Dscho - Does that sound like the right
> track? Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jay
>
> On Sep 13, 2014, at 9:20 AM, Jean-Yves Tinevez <tinevez at pasteur.fr> wrote:
>
>  On 13-Sep-14 16:01, Jay Warrick wrote:
>
> Hi Jean-Yves,
>
>  Thanks for the quick reply! Here are the poms for my multi module
> project. I added to the default "pom.xml" names to make things easier to
> follow. The Master pom is the parent pom for each of my project modules.
> The parent of Master is scijava. The JEX module has essentially one class,
> Main which calls the main class in Core. Core contains essentially the
> whole program including the dependency on TrackMate. Broken contains broken
> code for one reason or another but doesn't really come into play as the
> Broken module is not part of the build process. It is "disabled" using a
> profile within the JEX module. Despite this, I still confirmed it didn't
> depend on TrackMate 2.3 using the Eclipse dependency hierarchy viewer, just
> in case.
>
>
> Ok thank you for the crystal clear report.
> We are on the verge of what I know of maven. However I remember having a
> similar issue that was fixed by making the parent of the master pom the
> fiji plugin pom, like for TrackMate pom.
>
> Any chance you could just try that first?
> jy
>
>
> ------------------------------
>    <http://www.avast.com/>
>
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
> <http://www.avast.com/> protection is active.
>
>  _______________________________________________
> ImageJ-devel mailing list
> ImageJ-devel at imagej.net
> http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ImageJ-devel mailing list
> ImageJ-devel at imagej.net
> http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ImageJ-devel mailing list
> ImageJ-devel at imagej.net
> http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ImageJ-devel mailing list
> ImageJ-devel at imagej.net
> http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ImageJ-devel mailing list
> ImageJ-devel at imagej.net
> http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://imagej.net/pipermail/imagej-devel/attachments/20140914/53e66836/attachment.html>