[ImageJ-devel] Code duplication...

[Barry DeZonia]

Steffi,

Maybe I'm misunderstanding your description. If you are going to pull
values out of these intervals then I think of them as functions. If you are
going to change underlying values within the intervals I do not think of
them as functions. Can we think of an alternate package name?

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Stephan Preibisch <preibisch at mpi-cbg.de>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Tobias and me have been thinking we could establish a new package
>
> net.imglib2.function
>
> in which (image) data classes are located that are not Img. This includes
> RealRandomAccessibles, RandomAccessibles, Iterables, IterableIntervals or
> InterableRealIntervals.
>
> The first example would be indeed the Constant ... anything including its
> Cursors/RandomAcesses.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Bye bye,
> Steffi
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2012, at 12:32 , Stephan Preibisch wrote:
>
> > Hi Lee,
> >
> > this was exactly the course of our discussion. It is not an Img, so we
> need to find a place where this stuff will end up. Actually it is a
> specialization of any "Function" that can assign a value to any position in
> space. It should therefore also be RealRandomAccessible ...
> >
> > I would think about it a bit more before we start ...
> >
> > Nice greetings,
> > Steffi
> >
> > On Mar 13, 2012, at 11:45 , Lee Kamentsky wrote:
> >
> >> Hmmm... mine is certainly a candidate for removal. It looks like it is
> used in a couple of places and one is pretty pedantic. It's nice to have
> the ConstantRandomAccessible for places that take that instead of a
> ConstantRandomAccess.
> >>
> >> I have a ConstantRealRandomAccess too, in the
> net.imglib2.sampler.special package. That doesn't fit into
> net.imglib2.img.constant. What happens to it?
> >>
> >> If someone else wants to make the modifications, it's fine with me. If
> I were to do it, I'd add ConstantRandomAccessible to
> net.imglib2.img.constant, remove ConstantRandomAccessible and fix the two
> places where it's used. Any volunteers? If not, I'll mod.
> >>
> >> --Lee
> >>
> >> On 3/13/2012 11:04 AM, Tobias Pietzsch wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I just noticed that currently there are 3 (three!)
> ConstantRandomAccess implementations in ImgLib2
> >>>
> >>> One by Albert in
> >>> net.imglib2.script.img.fn
> >>>
> >>> One by Steffi in
> >>> net.imglib2.img.constant
> >>>
> >>> And one by Lee (as an inner class) in
> >>> net.imglib2.sampler.special.ConstantRandomAccess
> >>>
> >>> I didn't look in detail, but essentially all of those are doing the
> same thing.  Could we maybe get rid of two of those?
> >>>
> >>> best regards,
> >>> Tobias
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ImageJ-devel mailing list
> > ImageJ-devel at imagej.net
> > http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ImageJ-devel mailing list
> ImageJ-devel at imagej.net
> http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://imagej.net/pipermail/imagej-devel/attachments/20120319/c6501eee/attachment-0001.html>