[ImageJ-devel] Auto-Documentation of Processing Chain: Extension of @Parameter Annotation
Gabriel Landini
G.Landini at bham.ac.uk
Wed May 18 09:02:37 CDT 2011
This sounds quite interesting. Something that I wonder is how is the workflow
merged when let's say we operates images each with related or unrelated
histories.
Let's suppose that one wishes to divide a current image -with all its history
of processes- by another image -with its history of processes too. The second
image might be derived from the first one too.
It might be that unless all this is started from scratch and recorded every
step, on has lots of unknowns in the workflow? Is the idea to do this by
default or only when required, like with the macro recorder?
And where are all these workflow histories stored? With the images themselves?
Sorry for the many questions.
Cheers
Gabriel
More information about the ImageJ-devel
mailing list