[ImageJ-devel] Labeling / segmentation proposal for imglib

[Lee Kamentsky]

Now I do ;-)

I think the ShapeImage container is not appropriate since it's based on 
java.awt.Shape - I think that segmentation results are too general to be 
represented by shapes, the ShapeListCache doesn't scale to hundreds of 
labels per image, and the typical algorithms used on these sorts of 
results might not be efficient. Also, using java.awt on the Mac will 
cause difficulties for CellProfiler and others because of some 
unfortunate implementation decisions in awt and Mac OS beyond our control.

--Lee

On 11/16/2010 4:44 PM, Albert Cardona wrote:
> Lee,
>
> You know about the ShapeImage container, right?
>
> http://pacific.mpi-cbg.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=imglib.git;a=tree;f=imglib/src/main/java/mpicbg/imglib/container/shapelist;hb=HEAD
>
> Just checking.
>
> Albert
>
> 2010/11/16 Lee Kamentsky<leek at broadinstitute.org>:
>> Hi all,
>> I'm looking to possibly add some support for representing segmentation
>> results in ImageJ 2.0 / imglib. The enclosed document discusses the
>> rationale for labeling as something distinct from ROI and proposes an
>> implementation strategy; I'd like comments.
>>
>> --Lee
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ImageJ-devel mailing list
>> ImageJ-devel at imagejdev.org
>> http://imagejdev.org/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
>>
>>
>
>