[ImageJ-devel] Fiji.sc or ImageJ.net

[Curtis Rueden]

Hi Nico,

> Would it be possible to explain somewhere public the relation between
> Fiji.sc and ImageJ.net for both visitors and contributors?

This is a good discussion to have with the community.

Up till now, the idea has been that fiji.sc is more appropriate when giving
links to Fiji-specific content (e.g.,
http://fiji.sc/Fiji_contribution_requirements), whereas imagej.net is best
for topics relevant to ImageJ in general.

But, I think it will continue to be a source of confusion moving forward.
It might be best if all fiji.sc URLs simply redirect to imagej.net in the
future. What do others think?

> It appears these are the same with a different skin

That is correct.

> editing a page on Fiji.sc results in a server error

It should work if you click the "Edit source" link. The "Edit" link tries
to load the WYSIWYG editor, which is currently broken. That said, I
personally always just use imagej.net to edit.

Regards,
Curtis

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Nico Stuurman <nico.stuurman at ucsf.edu>
wrote:

>  Would it be possible to explain somewhere public the relation between
> Fiji.sc and ImageJ.net for both visitors and contributors?  It appears
> these are the same with a different skin, but whereas editing a page on
> Fiji.sc results in a server error, editing ImageJ.net is OK.  Some
> explanation to contributors, for instance in a welcome email after
> registering would save time.
>
> Best,
>
> Nico
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ImageJ-devel mailing list
> ImageJ-devel at imagej.net
> http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://imagej.net/pipermail/imagej-devel/attachments/20150724/cd356066/attachment.html>