[ImageJ-devel] Bug in ImageJ2 ?
Curtis Rueden
ctrueden at wisc.edu
Wed Sep 12 15:15:03 CDT 2012
Hi Michael,
> There seems to be an issue with the InputHarvester and the SwingPanel if
> the object types of primitive java types are used as input parameters (e.g.
> Boolean instead of boolean).
Sorry for the delay in my reply. I fixed the bug shortly after sending my
first mail, but was waiting to reply back until I did some more thorough
investigation of the widget framework.
In short, the NPE is fixed, and both plugins will work now.
The long story is that despite that, there is one remaining issue of sorts
with certain types of widgets. The toggle widget (with big B Booleans) is
one of them, and the choice widget is another. The issue is that in some
cases, the widget is not totally capable of reflecting the model state.
In the case of Boolean, the widget model may begin with a null value, but
the toggle widget is only capable of displaying false or true. It will
display unchecked for null, and if the user presses OK right away, the
Boolean will be null (the widget changes nothing right now). But if you
check and then uncheck the box again, the parameter value goes from null to
true, and then from true to false. There is no way to set it back to null.
In the case of the choice widget, the model may begin with a value that is
not on the list of allowed choices (again, null in particular is a big
offender here). The choice widget immediately constrains the dropdown box
to the first item on the list and overwrites the model. So the widget ends
up being the reason the parameter doesn't end up with an (invalid) null
value.
This behavior is inconsistent, and ideally the model itself would enforce
value constraints, and the widgets would not overwrite them.
However, given the amount of time needed to correct this admittedly rather
trivial inconsistency/deficiency, we are not going to worry about it for
the time being.
Please let us know if you have any other questions or problems with ImageJ2!
Regards,
Curtis
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Curtis Rueden <ctrueden at wisc.edu> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
>
>> There seems to be an issue with the InputHarvester and the SwingPanel if
>> the object types of primitive java types are used as input parameters (e.g.
>> Boolean instead of boolean).
>
>
> Thanks for the report. It's definitely a bug due to our recent refactoring
> of the widget system. Both Boolean and boolean are supposed to work. I'll
> look into fixing it today.
>
> -Curtis
>
> P.S. Hopefully I will have time to respond to your ImgLib mail from
> yesterday, too. I really appreciate you taking the time to look at and
> improve the Projector logic. We did the minimum necessary at the time to
> get something working, but currently everything is planar, and there is no
> built-in (i.e., ImgLib2) zoom capability, which we will eventually need.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Michael Zinsmaier <
> michael.zinsmaier at gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Curtis,
>>
>> I try currently to integrate the new imglib and ImageJ2 version (stuff
>> from yesterday) into the KNIME ImageJ2 plugin.
>> There seems to be an issue with the InputHarvester and the SwingPanel if
>> the object types of primitive java types are
>> used as input parameters (e.g. Boolean instead of boolean).
>>
>> The following plugin works fine:
>>
>> @Plugin(menu = {@Menu(label = "works")},
>> headless=true)
>> public class Working<T extends RealType<T>> implements RunnablePlugin {
>>
>> @Parameter(type = ItemIO.INPUT)
>> private boolean test;
>>
>> @Parameter(type = ItemIO.OUTPUT)
>> private String output;
>>
>> public void run() {
>> if (test) {
>> output = "plugins can be defined as fragments of
>> imagej.core";
>> }
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>> while this plugin (Boolean instead of boolean) cannot be executed and
>> results in a null pointer exception.
>>
>>
>> @Plugin(menu = {@Menu(label = "works not")},
>> headless=true)
>> public class NotWorking<T extends RealType<T>> implements RunnablePlugin {
>>
>> @Parameter(type = ItemIO.INPUT)
>> private Boolean test;
>>
>> @Parameter(type = ItemIO.OUTPUT)
>> private String output;
>>
>> public void run() {
>> if (test) {
>> output = "plugins can be defined as fragments of
>> imagej.core";
>> }
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>> Are only primitive types supported or is it a bug?
>>
>> Regards
>> Michael
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://imagej.net/pipermail/imagej-devel/attachments/20120912/17995c24/attachment.html>
More information about the ImageJ-devel
mailing list