[ImageJ-devel] Imglib benchmarks

[Curtis Rueden]

 Hi Dimiter,

Thank you very much for the effort! Do you have other meaningful benchmarks?
>

Not yet. Do you have any suggestions? Now that I have worked out how to use
Flot to generate charts on the web site, I could set up additional charts
pretty easily.

In the mean while I have evolved PixLib and now I am ready to
> demonstrate basic Mathematical morphology in D-dimensions.
>

Great. If the time performance of PixLib changes, let me know and I can
rerun the benchmark and update the numbers.

-Curtis

On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Dimiter Prodanov <dimiterpp at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Curtis,
>
> Thank you very much for the effort! Do you have other meaningful
> benchmarks?
> In the mean while I have evolved PixLib and now I am ready to
> demonstrate basic Mathematical morphology in D-dimensions.
>
> best regards,
>
> Dimiter
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Curtis Rueden <ctrueden at wisc.edu> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > For those interested, we have posted some benchmarks comparing ImageJ,
> > imglib (http://pacific.mpi-cbg.de/wiki/index.php/Imglib) and PixLib
> > (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pixlib/) with raw byte array
> performance:
> >
> >   http://imagejdev.org/imglib-benchmarks
> >
> > Comments and questions welcome!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Curtis
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://imagej.net/pipermail/imagej-devel/attachments/20101129/f4163b83/attachment.html>