[ImageJ-bugs] [Bug 921] New: Script editor attempts to parse @ in /* comments */ as parameters
bugzilla at fiji.sc
bugzilla at fiji.sc
Thu Aug 28 18:16:13 CDT 2014
http://fiji.sc/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=921
Bug ID: 921
Summary: Script editor attempts to parse @ in /* comments */ as
parameters
Product: Fiji
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: SCIFIO
Assignee: imagej-bugs at imagej.net
Reporter: saalfeld at mpi-cbg.de
A Beanshell script that starts with a documenting comment:
/**
*
* @author Monkey
*/
triggers an error message:
Started joint-lens-samples.bsh at Thu Aug 28 19:09:07 EDT 2014
Parse error at line 1, column 2. Encountered: *
at bsh.Parser.generateParseException(Unknown Source)
at bsh.Parser.jj_consume_token(Unknown Source)
at bsh.Parser.Line(Unknown Source)
at bsh.Interpreter.Line(Unknown Source)
at bsh.Interpreter.eval(Unknown Source)
at
org.scijava.plugins.scripting.beanshell.BeanshellScriptEngine.eval(BeanshellScriptEngine.java:80)
at org.scijava.script.ScriptModule.run(ScriptModule.java:172)
at org.scijava.module.ModuleRunner.run(ModuleRunner.java:167)
at org.scijava.module.ModuleRunner.call(ModuleRunner.java:126)
at org.scijava.module.ModuleRunner.call(ModuleRunner.java:65)
at
org.scijava.thread.DefaultThreadService$2.call(DefaultThreadService.java:164)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
I suspect that the method to parse annotation style parameters is not robust
against comments. Removing the comment enables the script to run. The
Beanshell Interpreter runs it with the comment.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://imagej.net/pipermail/imagej-bugs/attachments/20140828/5bf29ec2/attachment.html>
More information about the Imagej-bugs
mailing list