My email server is loving all the exercize, however you decide to proceed ;)<br><br><span style="font-family:Prelude, Verdana, san-serif;"><br><br></span><span id="signature"><div id="no_signature" style="overflow:hidden;"></div></span><span style="color:navy; font-family:Prelude, Verdana, san-serif; "><hr align="left" style="width:75%">On Jun 1, 2012 2:36 PM, Albert Cardona <sapristi@gmail.com> wrote: <br><br>2012/6/1 Curtis Rueden <ctrueden@wisc.edu>:
<br>> Hi everyone,
<br>>
<br>>> I second Johannes. No benefits from splitting the mailing lists.
<br>>
<br>>
<br>> Fair enough. Do you have a preference on "best practice" when discussing
<br>> ImgLib issues then? Use fiji-devel? Use imagej-devel? Always cross-post?
<br>> Other?
<br>
<br>
<br>fiji-devel and imagej-devel have come to be the same thing, but not
<br>quite, so I would leave them separate. Cross-posting is pointless
<br>because all interested are like 10 people at this point, and almost
<br>all belong to both mailing lists. I gather that most members of
<br>fiji-devel are not interested in the discussion of the internals of
<br>the new imagej (at least not yet), or in hearing about jenkins. ImgLib
<br>originated in the fiji community, seems easiest to leave imglib
<br>discussion there.
<br>
<br>Albert
<br>
<br>--
<br>http://albert.rierol.net
<br>http://www.ini.uzh.ch/~acardona/
<br>
<br>_______________________________________________
<br>ImageJ-devel mailing list
<br>ImageJ-devel@imagej.net
<br>http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
<br></span>