Hi Gabriel,<br><br><blockquote style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">Sorry to be critical, but the perspective seems to be wrong making the<br>
microscope to look odd.<br></blockquote><br>The drawing is essentially verbatim from a photograph that Johannes & I took. See the gallery at:<br> <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/gallery/5695175/1//microscopes?h=a9095a">https://www.dropbox.com/gallery/5695175/1//microscopes?h=a9095a</a><br>
<br>Specifically, check out image 14 of 38.<br><br><blockquote style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">
What about using something like the image below, possibly converted to vector<br>
graphics?<br></blockquote><br>Unfortunately, Adam is leaving the team, and will not have time to develop any more vectorized images. Also, keep in mind that the image must be simple enough to be discernible at various smaller resolutions including 32x32 and even 16x16 (with a little tweaking).<br>
<br>Perhaps we should do a similar thing for the logo as with the About dialog images: let's hold an open contest where people can submit candidate logos, and then the community can vote on the one they like best. What do you think?<br>
<br>Regards,<br>Curtis<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Gabriel Landini <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:G.Landini@bham.ac.uk">G.Landini@bham.ac.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">On Friday 28 Oct 2011 00:47:35 Adam Fraser wrote:<br>
> Attached are the cleaned up versions of the icon and a jpg (for now) of the<br>
> scope logo at about 512px. I'll make sure to send you guys all the sources<br>
> later and I'll include a png on transparency of the larger version. Just<br>
> wanted to get you something to look at.<br>
<br>
</div></div>Sorry to be critical, but the perspective seems to be wrong making the<br>
microscope to look odd.<br>
<br>
If you one see both sides proximal and distal of the revolving piece, then one<br>
cannot see the connection between the bronze and black tube as horizontal<br>
lines. The perspective of the top and bottom do not match.<br>
<br>
What about using something like the image below, possibly converted to vector<br>
graphics?<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.arsmachina.com/images/watson1354-2.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.arsmachina.com/images/watson1354-2.jpg</a><br>
<br>
Those are the same people from where Wayne used the image for IJ, and they<br>
seemed to be OK being used. Maybe they can be approached again.<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
<br>
Gabriel<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ImageJ-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ImageJ-devel@imagejdev.org">ImageJ-devel@imagejdev.org</a><br>
<a href="http://imagejdev.org/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel" target="_blank">http://imagejdev.org/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>