Hi everyone,<br><br>After thinking about it, I agree with Albert & Adam, and also like Gabriel's suggestion of "ImageData." As Stephan said, we can discuss further when I visit in a few days.<br><br>-Curtis<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Adam Fraser <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:adam.n.fraser@gmail.com">adam.n.fraser@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
I'm with Albert. It should sound like it's an image. To me, to call it a Tensor is nearly as general as calling it an Object.<br><br><div>PRO:<br>IJImage<br>NDImage<br>ImageND<br>ImageN<br>Img</div>
<div><br>Cheers,<br>Adam</div><div><br></div><div>@Gabriel: sorry, about the duplicate, forgot to "reply all"</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
ImageJ-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ImageJ-devel@imagejdev.org">ImageJ-devel@imagejdev.org</a><br>
<a href="http://imagejdev.org/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel" target="_blank">http://imagejdev.org/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>