<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="BLOCKNOTE.NET">
<meta name="source"
content="http://www.google.com/search?q=javax.annotation&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a">
<title></title>
<style>BODY { FONT-FAMILY:Verdana; FONT-SIZE:10pt }
P { FONT-FAMILY:Verdana; FONT-SIZE:10pt }
DIV { FONT-FAMILY:Verdana; FONT-SIZE:10pt }
TD { FONT-FAMILY:Verdana; FONT-SIZE:10pt }
</style><basefont face="Verdana" size="2">ImageJ'ers --<br>
<br>
JSR-305 defines annotations that enable static analysis, compiler
checks, and other tools to improve safety and robustness. They are
expected to be in JDK7. Any opinion on whether we might want to
adopt the use of any of these as a group (perhaps at least in the
'core')?<br>
<br>
See: <br>
<br>
<a
href="http://java.net/article/2008/09/08/open-road-javaxannotation"><strong>The
Open Road: <em>javax</em>.<em>annotation</em></strong></a><br>
<br>
<div><a href="http://code.google.com/p/jsr-305"><em>JSR 305:
Annotations for Software Defect Detection in Java</em></a><br>
<br>
<br>
-- Grant<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>