I like the separation structure and the naming.<br>Sincerely,<br>Rick<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Stephan Saalfeld <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:saalfeld@mpi-cbg.de">saalfeld@mpi-cbg.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Hi,<br>
<br>
the splitting is fine with me but I would prefer a slightly more<br>
consistent naming scheme (learning from bad example OpenCV):<br>
<br>
core -> imglib-core.jar<br>
test -> imglib-test.jar<br>
algorithm -> imglib-algorithm.jar<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
<font color="#888888">Stephan<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 15:56 +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> I discussed some issues with Steffi, and one of the outcomes is: we<br>
> definitely need a saner directory layout. So the idea is to have<br>
><br>
> imglib/ (packages mpicbg.imglib.*)<br>
> tests/ (package mpicbg.imglib.test)<br>
> imglib-algo/ (packages mpicbg.imglib.algorithm.*)<br>
><br>
> These will directly correspond to imglib.jar, tests.jar and<br>
> imglib-algo.jar.<br>
><br>
> Any objections?<br>
><br>
> We have a tentative date of next Thursday in mind, by which time most of<br>
> the topic-branch stuff should be reviewed enough to be merged into master<br>
> by one of the Stephans.<br>
><br>
> Ciao,<br>
> Johannes<br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ImageJ-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ImageJ-devel@imagejdev.org">ImageJ-devel@imagejdev.org</a><br>
<a href="http://imagejdev.org/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel" target="_blank">http://imagejdev.org/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Sincerely,<br><br>Rick Lentz<br>(608) 217-8592<br>Bascom Hall - "...ever encourage that continual and fearless sifting and winnowing by which alone the truth can be found"<br>