<html>
<head>
<base href="http://fiji.sc/bugzilla/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Multithreading problem in javascript macro"
href="http://fiji.sc/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=854#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Multithreading problem in javascript macro"
href="http://fiji.sc/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=854">bug 854</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:thomas.siegmund@evotec.com" title="Thomas Siegmund <thomas.siegmund@evotec.com>"> <span class="fn">Thomas Siegmund</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Thanks a lot for your comments, Curtis.
<span class="quote">> Curtis wrote:
> I think there is no option but for you, or someone else in your group, to dig in more deeply and identify the root cause of the issue.</span >
Fair enough, but I don't know if we will find time to dig as deep into ImageJ
as you propose - maybe I'd rather look into alternatives. ImageJ has served us
well for many years, but with more and more data from automated microscope
systems there is definitely need for a high performance (and this means thread
save) platform.
<span class="quote">> Curtis wrote:
> ImageJ 1.x is rife with concurrency problems lurking under the hood, which most people rarely encounter, but which advanced script writers such as yourself sometimes bump into.</span >
Maybe there should be a warning somewhere on the pages advertising
multithreaded scripting. I noticed these problems only due to a bug in an
earlier version of my script. If I had done I better job I would not have
noticed these deeper problems.
Thanks again
Thomas</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>